Response of ten yellow mango cultivars to powdery mildew (Erysiphe quercicola) damage in México

Amado Pérez-Rodríguez, José Antonio Mora-Aguilera, Carlos De León-García de Alba, José Sergio Sandoval-Islas, Elías Hernández-Castro, Alfonso Vásquez-López

Abstract


Mango powdery mildew (Erysiphe quercicola) causes up to 90% production losses, so it is necessary to estimate the tolerance to this pathogen of the new germplasm introduced or recently generated to increase the export potential of Mexico. The objective of this study was to determine the response to powdery mildew damage by means of an optimized inoculation technique to induce the disease in attached leaves of 10 new yellow mango cultivars for Mexico. Two inoculation methods were evaluated. The best was to spray conidia at 4.6 x 105 spores mL-1 on the adaxial and abaxial leaves surfaces, at ± 300-450 lux and suspended in polysorbate 20 + surfactant based on ethoxilate alcohols at 2%. The inoculation test showed that the cv. Alphonso was moderately tolerant and Neelum and Fairchild were slightly tolerant. In contrast, Nam Doc Mai, Rosigold, Ataulfo Zafiro, Cotaxtla and Kesar were susceptible and Mallika and Ivory were highly susceptible. The most tolerant cultivars had lower values of incidence, maximum severity, area under the disease progress curve, apparent infection rate and conidia density per cm2 of damaged leaf area (LSD, P ? 0.05).


Keywords


leaves; susceptibility; germplasm; severity

Full Text:

PDF (Español)

References


Achicanoy LH. 2000. Descripción cuantitativa de epidemias de plantas. Revista de la Facultad Nacional de Agricultura de Medellín 53(1):941-968. Disponible en línea: http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/26473/1/24069-84222-1-PB.pdf

Adikaram NKB, Mlewa G and Weerahewa D. 2002. Changes in pigment composition, acid metabolism, etc. in Pedilanthus tithymaloides leaf following powdery mildew infection. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 30:1-11. DOI: 10.4038/jnsfsr.v30i1-2.2556

Akhtar KP, Khan MA, Kazmi MR, Hussain RI and Fatima B. 1999. Preventive control of powdery mildew disease of mango. Agricultural Sciences 4(1):23-28. Disponible en línea: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289519342_Preventive_control_of_powdery_mildew_of_mango

Arias SJF, Espinosa AJ, Rico PHR, Miranda SMA y Chávez CX. 2004. La cenicilla Oidium mangiferae Berthet del mango en Michoacán. INIFAP, CIRPAC. Campo Experimental Valle de Apatzingán. Folleto Técnico Núm. 1. Apatzingán, Michoacán, México. Disponible en línea: http://biblioteca.inifap.gob.mx:8080/jspui/bitstream/handle/123456789/1288/cenicilla_1288.pdf?sequence=1

Braun U and Cook RTA. 2012. Taxonomic manual of the Erysiphales (Powdery Mildews). CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 707 p. Disponible en línea: https://www.nhbs.com/taxonomic-manual-of-the-erysiphales-powdery-mildews-book

Campbell CW. 1961. Comparison of yield of poliembrionic and monoembrionic mangos. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 74: 363-365. Disponible en línea: http://fshs.org/proceedings-o/1961-vol-74/363-365%20(CAMPBELL).pdf

Campbell CL and Benson DM. 1994. Spatial aspects of the development of root disease epidemics. Pp. 195-243. In: Campbell CL and Benson DM. (eds.). Epidemiology and management of root diseases. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 339p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85063-9_7

FAO. 2016. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. Disponible en línea: http://faostat.fao.org/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=339〈=es

Félix GR, Herrera RG, Martinez VC, Longoria ERM, Maldonado MIE, Quiroz FFR, Martinez AJC, Garcia PLM and Espinoza MS. 2013. First report of powdery mildew (Pseudoidium anacardii) of mango trees in Sinaloa, Mexico. Plant Disease 97(7):994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-12-1014-PDN

Félix GR, Maldonado MIE, Beltran PH, Apodaca SMA, Espinoza MS, Martínez VMC, Longoria ERM and Oli¬vas PNG. 2017. Powdery mildews in agricultural crops of Sinaloa: Current status on their identification and future research lines. Revista Mexicana de Fitopato¬logía 35:106-129. DOI: 10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.1607-4

Frias GA, Purdy LH and Schmidt RA. 1995. An inoculation method for evaluating resistance of cacao to Crinipellis perniciosa. Plant Disease 79:787-791. Disponible en línea: http://www.apsnet.org/publications/PlantDisease/BackIssues/Documents/1995Articles/PlantDisease79n08_787.PDF

Galli JA, Fischer IH and Palharini MCA. 2012. Pre and post-harvest diseases in mango varieties cultivated in organic system. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 34(3):734-743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452012000300012

Galli JA, Silveira LCP, Michelotto MD and Martins ALM. 2008. Powdery mildew (Oidium mangiferae Bert.) infection in mango varieties. Bioscience Journal 24(2):43-46. Disponible en línea: http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/6744/4451

Galli JA, Silveira LCP, Michelotto MD and Martins ALM. 2009. Evaluation of anthracnose incidence, development and nutritional status of mango trees varieties for organic cultivation in north center region of São Paulo state. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 31(3):701-709. Disponible en línea: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbf/v31n3/a12v31n3.pdf

Guillén SD, Téliz OD, Mora AG, Mora AA, Sánchez GP y González HV. 2003. Desarrollo temporal de epidemias de cenicilla (Oidium mangiferae Berthet) en huertos de mango (Mangifera indica L.) en Michoacán, México. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 21(2):181-188. Disponible en línea: http://www.redalyc.org/html/612/61221213/index.html

Gupta JH. 1976. Reaction of mango varieties to powdery mildew (Oidium mangiferae) in Uttar Pradesh. Progressive Horticulture 8:63-64.

Gupta JH. 1989. Longevity of conidia of Oidium mangiferae causing powdery mildew of mango. Indian Journal Mycology and Plant Pathology 19:123-124.

Gupta JH. 1989b. Perpetuation and epidemiology of powdery mildew of mango. Acta Horticulture 231:528-533. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.231.4

Hernández SD y Martínez DMA. 2009. Procedimiento para el análisis de equilibrio parcial de las exportaciones mexicanas de mango (Mangifera indica) a EE.UU. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 32(3):251-256. Disponible en línea:

http://www.revistafitotecniamexicana.org/documentos/32-3/10a.pdf

Jansen C, Wettstein D, Shäfer W, Kogel KH, Felk A and Maier FJ. 2005. Infection

patterns in barley and wheat spikes inoculated with wild-type and trichodiene

synthase gene disrupted Fusarium graminearum. Proceedings of the National

Academy of Sciences, USA 102(46):16892-16897. Disponible en línea: http://www.pnas.org/content/102/46/16892.full.pdf

Jia Y, Valent B and Lee FN. 2003. Determination of host responses to Magnaporthe

grisea on detached rice leaves using a spot inoculation method. Plant Disease 87:129-133. Disponible en línea: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249303304_Determination_of_Host_Responses_to_Magnaporthe_grisea_on_Detached_Rice_Leaves_Using_a_Spot_Inoculation_Method

Khalid P, Akhtar and Alam SS. 2000. Powdery mildew of mango: a review. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 3 (7):1119-1122. Disponible en línea:

http://scialert.net/qredirect.php?doi=pjbs.2000.1119.1122&linkid=pdf

Misra AK. 2001. Powdery mildew - A serious disease of mango. Journal of Applied Horticulture 3(1):63-68. Disponible en línea:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281590887_Powdery_mildew_-A_serious_disease_of_mango

Misra AK, Shukla PK and Pandey BK. 2012. Diseases of Mango. Pp. 278-335. In: Diseases of fruit crops. Misra AK, Chowdappa P, Sharma P and Khetrapal RK. (eds.). Indian Phytopathological Society. New Delhi. 342p. Disponible en línea: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311886856_Diseases_of_Mango

Munshi GD, Jhooty JS and Jasmit K. 1988. Perennation of powdery mildew of mango as leaf infections. Indian Journal Mycologyl and Plant Pathology 18: 68-69.

Naqvi SAH, Perveen R, Manzoor SA, Umar HMI, Iqbal MT, Liaquat F, Majid T and Irshad A. 2014. Evaluation of various mango varieties against the infection dynamics of powdery mildew (Oidium mangiferae Bert.). American Journal of Plant Sciences 5:2372-2377. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.515250

Nasir M, Mughal SM, Mukhtar T and Awan MZ. 2014. Powdery mildew of mango: a review of ecology, biology, epidemiology and management. Crop Protection 64:19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.06.003

Nelson SC. 2008. Mango powdery mildew. Cooperative Extension Service. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. University of Hawaii at Manoa. Plant Disease: PD-46. Disponible en línea: https://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/PD-46.pdf

Nofal MA and Haggag WM. 2006. Integrated management of powdery mildew of mango in Egypt. Crop Protection 25:480-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.08.003

Palti J, Pinkays Y and Chorin M. 1974. Powdery mildew of mango. Plant Disease Report 58:45-49.

Pérez RA. 2017. Tolerancia de cultivares de mango (Mangifera indica L.) a la cenicilla (Oidium mangiferae Berthet.) en México. Tesis de Doctorado. Colegio de Postgraduados. Postgrado de Fitosanidad, Fitopatología. Montecillo, Texcoco, Edo. de México. 78p.

Pérez RA, Monteon OA, Mora AA, Hernandez CE. 2017a. Epidemiology and strategies for chemical management of powdery mildew in mango. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 52(9):715-723. Disponible en línea: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v52n9/1678-3921-pab-52-09-00715.pdf

Pérez RA, Pérez RM, Talavera VA, García EP y Durán TY. 2017b. Manejo Químico de la cenicilla del mango y su interacción con factores ambientales. Revista Mexicana de Fitosanidad 1(3):30-37. Disponible en línea:

http://revimexfito.com.mx/files1/Remefi%201_3/REMEFI_30-37_2017.pdf

Peterson RA. 1984. Mango diseases. Pp: 233-247. In: Proceedings of the First Australian Mango Research Workshop, Cairns, Queensland. CSIRO. 392p. Disponible en línea: http://catalog.lib.msu.edu/record=b1711286~S39a

Pinto ACQ, Costa JG and Santos CAF. 2002. Principais cultivares. Pp: 95-116. In: GENÚ PJ de C and Pinto AC de Q (eds.). A cultura da mangueira. Brasilia: Embrapa, Informação Tecnológica. 116p. Disponible en línea: https://www.passeidireto.com/arquivo/1095467/a-cultura-da-mangueira

Ploetz RC and Freeman S. 2009. Foliar, floral and Soilborne Diseases. Pp. 231-302. In: Litz RE (2nd ed.). The mango: botany, production and uses. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. 669p. https://dx.doi.org/10.1079%2F9781845934897.0000

Raheel M, Anwar SA, Javed N, Ilyas MB, Iqbal M and Zia A. 2008. Management of powdery mildew of mango by foliar spray fungicides. Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology 21:173-174. Disponible en línea:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235816522_Management_of_powdery_mildew_of_mango_by_foliar_spray_fungicides

SAS Institute. 2016. SAS 9.4 OLAP server: User´s Guide, SAS Institute. Fifth Edition. Cary, North Caroline, USA. Disponible en línea: https://www.sas.com/es_mx/software/sas9.html

Schoeman MH, Manicom BQ and Wingfield MJ. 1995. Epidemiology of powdery mildew on mango blossoms. Plant Disease 79:524-528. DOI: 10.1094/PD-79-0524

Sholberg PL, Lane WD, Haag P, Bedford K and Lashuk L. 2001. A novel technique for evaluation of apple (Malus x domestica Borkh) cultivars for susceptibility to powdery mildew. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 81(2):289.296. https://doi.org/10.4141/P00-072

Sinha P, Prajneshu R and Varma A. 2001. Studies on determining favourable factors for the germination of conidia of Oidium mangiferae. Indian Phytopathology 54(2):197-200. Disponible en línea: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20013126011

Sinha P, Prajneshu R and Varma A. 2002. Growth models for powdery mildew development of mango. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 10(1):84-87. Disponible en línea: http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:apps&volume=10&issue=1&article=020

Tam LTT. 2017. Identification powdery mildew Erysiphe quercicola damaging on mango in Hanoi, Vietnam. Journal of Bacteriology and Mycology 4(6):00111. DOI: 10.15406/jbmoa.2017.04.00111

Villegas MA y Mora AA. 2011. Avances de la fruticultura en México. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura Vol. Especial: 179-186. Disponible en línea:

http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbf/v33nspe1/a21v33nspe1.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.1711-5

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.